How Face Velocity Determines Breakthrough Time in Honeycomb Activated Carbon Filters

How Face Velocity Determines Breakthrough Time in Honeycomb Activated Carbon Filters

LinkedIn
Facebook
WhatsApp

In industrial gas-phase filtration systems, breakthrough time is one of the most important indicators of real operating performance. While parameters such as CPSI and pressure drop describe structural and airflow characteristics, face velocity directly influences how long a honeycomb activated carbon filter can effectively remove contaminants.

Face velocity — defined as the airflow rate divided by the effective filter surface area – determines how quickly contaminated air passes through the honeycomb structure. As a result, it plays a central role in adsorption kinetics, contact time, and carbon utilization.


1. What Is Face Velocity?

Face velocity is typically expressed in meters per second (m/s) or feet per minute (FPM). It represents the linear speed of air entering the filter surface.

  • Higher face velocity → faster airflow
  • Lower face velocity → slower airflow

Although increasing face velocity can reduce required filter surface area and system size, it also reduces the time available for adsorption to occur inside the carbon structure.

2. Breakthrough Time: What It Really Means

Breakthrough time refers to the period during which the filter effectively removes contaminants before outlet concentration rises above an acceptable limit.

Breakthrough is influenced by:

  • Adsorbent capacity
  • Mass transfer rate
  • Gas concentration
  • Face velocity

cr. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency explains that carbon adsorption is a finite-capacity control process and breakthrough occurs when the adsorbent becomes saturated under operating flow conditions.

cr. Source: EPA – Activated Carbon Adsorber .

3. How Higher Face Velocity Shortens Breakthrough Time

When face velocity increases:

  • Contact time decreases
  • External mass transfer resistance may increase
  • Internal pore diffusion becomes less effective

This leads to incomplete utilization of the carbon bed. Instead of a gradual saturation profile, the adsorption front moves more quickly through the honeycomb structure, causing earlier breakthrough.

cr. Adsorption literature describes how gas velocity affects the length of the mass transfer zone and overall adsorbent utilization.

cr. Overview reference: ScienceDirect – Adsorption Kinetics .

4. The Concept of Contact Time

Contact time is often approximated as:

Contact Time ≈ Filter Depth ÷ Face Velocity

This simplified relationship illustrates why reducing velocity or increasing filter depth extends residence time and delays breakthrough.

Face VelocityContact TimeBreakthrough Tendency
LowLongerDelayed
ModerateBalancedPredictable
HighShortEarlier

5. Standardized Performance Testing Matters

Rather than relying on theoretical assumptions, breakthrough performance should be evaluated according to recognized test methods for gas-phase air cleaning devices.

cr. ISO 10121-2 specifies laboratory test methods for evaluating the performance of gas-phase air cleaning devices for general ventilation applications.

cr. Source: ISO 10121-2:2013 — Gas-phase air cleaning devices .

Conclusion

Face velocity is one of the most critical operating parameters in honeycomb activated carbon systems. While CPSI and pressure drop describe structure and airflow resistance, breakthrough time is strongly governed by how fast air moves through the filter. Optimizing face velocity ensures better contact time, improved carbon utilization, and more predictable service life in industrial gas-phase filtration applications.

Article Keywords: honeycomb activated carbon, face velocity, breakthrough time, adsorption kinetics, gas phase filtration, industrial air filtration, carbon utilization, contact time

More to explorer

activated-carbon-CPSI

Why CPSI Alone Cannot Define Honeycomb Activated Carbon Performance

This article explains why CPSI (cells per square inch) should not be treated as a standalone performance indicator for honeycomb activated carbon filters. By examining airflow behavior, contact time, adsorption kinetics, and carbon utilization, it highlights the limitations of CPSI-only comparisons and provides a more practical engineering perspective for industrial gas-phase filtration design.

Honeycomb activated carbon filter in industrial gas-phase ventilation system

Pressure Drop vs Adsorption Performance in Honeycomb Activated Carbon Filters

This article explains the engineering relationship between pressure drop and adsorption performance in honeycomb activated carbon filters. It clarifies why very low resistance can reduce contact time and carbon utilization, leading to earlier breakthrough. Practical guidance is provided to help engineers balance fan energy, airflow velocity, and adsorption kinetics for application-specific performance.

small_c_popup.png

Let's have a chat

Learn how we can help you for your need!